Senator Ben Sasse introduces a bill that helps advance the cause of repeal in six ways, most importantly by reducing the likelihood that Republicans would respond to a favorable verdict in King v. Burwell by expanding or “fixing” Obamacare.
The Weekly Standard, March 5, 2015GOP House chairmen, listening to the American people, start to outline a plan for how the goal of repealing and replacing Obamacare can become a reality.
The Weekly Standard, March 4, 2015
King v. Burwell affords a great opportunity for Republicans to advance a conservative alternative to Obamacare and provide a clear choice for voters in 2016.
The Weekly Standard, March 9, 2015
New polling finds that most Americans (including 55 percent of independents) want Congress to propose a conservative alternative in response to King v. Burwell, while only 20 percent (most of them Democrats) want Congress to negotiate fixes to Obamacare.
The Weekly Standard, February 26, 2015
A new poll by McLaughlin & Associates finds that Americans strongly support having Congress advance a conservative alternative in the context of King v. Burwell.
Not liking their autonomy, the Obama administration has declared war on private-practice doctors—whose numbers are therefore dwindling—and Republicans must come to their rescue.
Wall Street Journal, February 16, 2015
Liberal writers’ response to the Burr-Hatch-Upton alternative makes one wonder whether they really understand how Obamacare works.
The Weekly Standard, February 9, 2015The worst thing congressional Republicans could do in response to a favorable ruling in King v. Burwell would be to negotiate “free-market fixes” to Obamacare with the Obama White House.
The Weekly Standard, February 10, 2015The real choice in preparing for King v. Burwell is between effectively repealing and replacing Obamacare in 36 states, or “fixing” or expanding the 2,700-page monstrosity.
National Review, February 5, 2015
In an effort to keep Americans from feeling the legislation’s full effects, Obamacare’s cuts to Medicare Advantage, its employer mandate, part of its individual mandate, and now its requirements for paying back excess subsidies have all been delayed, and none of them by law.
Bloomberg, February 2, 2015Far from increasing competition and choice in health care as President Obama promised, Obamacare has resulted in higher health-care costs and fewer options for Americans.
Washington Times, January 25, 2015
The CBO projects that Obamacare will cost $50,000 per newly insured person over the next decade — in addition to $200 billion in “penalty payments” from Americans who refuse to buy or provide federally mandated insurance — and will leave 31 million uninsured.
Daily Mail, January 28, 2015
“If Republicans fail to coalesce around an alternative” to Obamacare, “Democrats will inevitably wait for their next opening to build on the law, working incrementally toward their ultimate goal of a fully government-run…healthcare system.”
Washington Examiner, January 23, 2015
This piece succinctly makes a point that those in Main Street America have sensed for a long time: health-care companies are fighting repeal efforts, not driving them.
Washington Examiner, January 14, 2015
Obamacare’s income-based subsidies are increasing the IRS’s unwelcome role in Americans’ lives.
Daily Signal, January 14, 2015